Ever wonder if the Romans or Ancient Egyptians thought about how they would be remembered?

Papyrus 66. Photo from Earlham University.
I’d be willing to bet the farm they did. The Great Pyramid, the Colosseum, The Pantheon, Karnak. The rulers were determined to make their stamp on history, to try and gain that illusive immortality (plus who wouldn’t want a giant stone edifice to themselves). But, what about the everyday person just trying to make enough to scrape by each day? These monuments gave them pride in their civilization and connected them to the gods, who in turn connected them to the ground they tilled, water they drank and food they ate.
The fact that hundreds upon hundreds of written documents survived from these civilizations is another reason we know so much about them and their legacy has carried on thousands of years after they ceased to exist. Recently, Assyrian clay tablets were found in southeastern Turkey which give even greater insight into the nitty gritty of the inner workings and management of the Assyrian Empire. And why is clay so great you ask? Because clay lasts. It lasts for a long, long time. History helps us make a connection between our lives and our distant ancestors’ lives. It helps us connect with where we came from way back in the day. History is more relateable if you can relate to it in terms of your own life, which is where all these documents on day-to-day activities comes into play.
So now back to the original question – how will we be remembered? How will those thousands of years from now connect to us? We’ve surpassed the oral tradition, papyrus, clay, books and are now onto computers. But are computers really superior in terms of preservation and achieving the immorality of being remembered? Sure with today’s technology and being able to store information all sorts of places – computer, harddrive, the ether – it seems like nothing will get lost. But this information is locked away, inaccessible unless one has our type of electricity, computer system, cords. In some cases, the internet has to exist to access it. And that’s all before you get to the challenge of deciphering a language that is no longer spoken or read. Electricity can go out, the internet could crash forever wiping out all the data stored there, harddrives fail more often than we like to think. Yes, books can be burned, but they are instantly accessible to the information they contain hundreds or even thousands of years after they were written. Are we placing too much reliance, faith, information in a system that archaeologists thousands of years from now my not be able to access?

Kindle. Photo from Wikipedia.
It’s not that the internet is a bad place to store information (I’m writing this blog after all and all you reading it are instantly reading it from all over the world). It’s that hard copies of the materials are being phased out. Look at the Kindle for instance. I’ve met lots of people who have made their library completely digital, all of it store out in ether and in an 8 in x 6 in piece of plastic, wiring and chips. Yes, there are people, like myself, who still love books. But, there seems to be a paperless trend growing. And paperless means inaccessibility unless you can still run the systems to access the data.
It’s hard to envision a time when the electronic systems we have in place won’t be accessible. One could argue that whatever civilization follows ours will simply grow out of ours and the data and records of our civilization will get converted as this growth occurs into whatever format this new civilization is using. Many would say that with globalization, airplanes, the internet; the world is too interconnected for one country to collapse and for all the information and records on that culture to be lost. But I would argue that no one country in today’s world is it’s own civilization, rather all the cultures in our present world are one civilization. Sure there are many distinctive difference’s, but with how interconnected the world has become we are one civilization. As witnessed with the collapse of the US banks – if one fails, they all fail.
If you traveled back to Ancient Rome or Ancient Egypt and asked an aware, well-educated individual if they foresaw the complete and utter destruction of their civilization to the point where no part of it existed in the world today beyond magnificent piles of rubble, a dead language, and a few philosophical ideas and traditions that were adopted hundreds to thousands of years after its collapse, I’m sure they would think you were crazy. Rome couldn’t fail, it had roads, a complex infrastructure, science and architecture and had conquered the known world. But fall it did. Ancient Egypt as one united civilization (as opposed to city states) lasted for 3,000 years, which is longer than Rome; longer than the United States, longer than Europe, longer than the Middle Ages, Rennaissance, Industrial Revolution and the modern age combined. Yet it too collapsed; it’s language lots and it’s culture nothing but something to study and remember. The time from the computer age onward could easily become the Miocene Gap for Homo sapiens sapiens. Instead, of a gap in knowledge caused by poor preservation conditions (not much is know about the hominids during this time, hence the gap) it’s caused by a lack of information and records saved in hardcopy.
It’s naive to believe we will always go on as we are now. Or that the systems and technology we have created will last

Aged books. Photo from Carnegie Melon Library.
forever, will survive our collapse and will be passed on to future civilizations. Maybe English or French or Chinese will be passed on to the next civilization, or maybe it won’t. Even if it is passed on, will our technology be passed on in such a way that our records and information can still be accessed? From studying ancient history, I can say it’s unlikely. Our systems are too complex and require things that aren’t hardy enough to weather great catastrophe. Think of trying to keep the internet running during the dark ages.
Future archaeologists wouldn’t be Dutch, Chinese, Somalian, Russian; they would be something completely different that grew out of the complete collapse of the countries, systems and structures in the world today. Or maybe human colonists that come back to Earth from far away galaxies to discover that we finally did it – World War III with nukes. And that all that’s left are a few sick humans and the steel shells of our once great civilization.
So what’s all this getting to? Next time you download your favorite book to Kindle and throw out or sell the hard copy stop for a moment and contemplate how we will be remembered by archaeologists. How we will be remembered and through what medium? Or better yet, what a future archaeologist would think of you tossing away that easily accessible hardcopy. I bet somewhere in the future there’s an archaeologist pulling on his hair in furry because there no accessible data on how the Irish government was run or what sort of literary materials were read in 21st century Germany. Or maybe not, maybe he or she is pouring over Catch-22 or Chaucer or Obama’s Inauguration Speech or a 12 year-old’s diary trying to piece together what life in our civilization was like and who we were as a very complex and diverse people.
Recent Comments